Citigroup "wins" but loses; Rakoff "loses" but wins

Believe it or not, one public official has actually stood up to the finagling banksters of Wall Street.

You're currently reading an archived version of Jim Hightower's work.

The latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our Substack website. Join us there!

Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Citigroup "wins" but loses; Rakoff "loses" but wins
Loading
/

Believe it or not, one public official has actually stood up to the finagling banksters of Wall Street.

Three years ago, Jed Rakoff, the US District Judge in Manhattan, stunned Citigroup by just saying no to a sweetheart deal it had cut with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The bank had been caught in an egregious case of ripping off customers by selling a mess of investments to them that the bankers knew would go bad. Sure enough, the customers lost $700 million, while Citigroup reaped $160 million from a side bet it made that the investments would indeed be worthless.

Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:

Yet, even though the SEC had a solid case against the crooks, rather than taking them to court for proper punishment, the agency slapped them on the wrist with a $285 million fine – pocket change for the $14 billion a year bank.

As is common in these sweetheart settlements, called “consent decrees,” the SEC didn’t even make Citigroup admit that it was guilty of fraud. Such decrees, however, have to be signed by a judge, and Rakoff was asked to rubber stamp this one. He refused! Like most Americans, he’s appalled by Washington’s coddling of Wall Street’s too-big-to-fail/too-big-to-jail banks, so he demanded that the two cozy parties submit proof that this deal had any relationship to justice.

Way to go, Jed! But rather than bother with such niceties as truth, Citigroup appealed Rakoff’s ruling, and now he is the one being punished. The appeals court reprimanded Rakoff for demanding truth from a Wall Street bank, declaring that it was not in his judicial purview “to demand cold, hard, solid facts.”

This is Jim Hightower saying… By getting the one guy who stood up slapped down, Citigroup and the SEC are claiming victory. But they actually lost any shred of public respectability they had left, while lifting the public’s esteem for Judge Rakoff higher than ever.

“Truth Ruled Out of Order,” The Wall Street Journal, June 8, 2014.

“Citigroup Reports Fourth Quarter 2013 Earnings per Share of $0.85; $0.82 Excluding CVA/DVA1 and Impact of the Credicard Divestiture2,” www.citigroup.com, January 16, 2014.

I’m making moves!

We’re pleased to announce that we’ve started a Substack newsletter for all of our content. You’ll still find our older, archived materials here at hightowerlowdown.org, but the latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our new Substack website.

Check out jimhightower.substack.com »

Send this to a friend