The chicanery of corporate food manufactures

Mothers the world over have told their children a zillion times: "Stop playing with your food!" I now share their frustration and would like to yell at the conglomerate packagers of America's victuals: "Stop playing with our food!"

You're currently reading an archived version of Jim Hightower's work.

The latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our Substack website. Join us there!

Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
The chicanery of corporate food manufactures
Loading
/

Mothers the world over have told their children a zillion times: “Stop playing with your food!” I now share their frustration and would like to yell at the conglomerate packagers of America’s victuals: “Stop playing with our food!”

Actually, they’re playing with our heads, using dishonest packaging tactics to raise their prices without us noticing it. A 16-ounce carton of something – shhhh – quietly slips to 14 ounces, but does not drop in price. Then there’s the dimple trick. A jar of Hellmann’s mayonnaise, for example, has had its contents shrunk, yet the new jar looks as big as the old one unless you turn in on its end. There you’ll find a big indention in the bottom – a hidden way to shrink the capacity of the jar and give you less for your money.

Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:

David Segal, who writes “The Haggler” column in the New York Times, recently reported on his Adventures-In-Kraft-Foods-Land. He talked to a PR lady there about the corporation’s unpublicized (but rather dramatic) change in its Baker’s brand of cooking chocolate. Instead of an eight-ounce package selling for $3.89, suddenly a box of Baker’s contained only four ounces of chocolate, which sells for $2.89. Wow – that’s nearly a 50-percent price hike per ounce! What gives, Segal asked the Kraft spokeswoman? “The change was consumer-driven,” she craftily replied. “Our consumers have told us that they prefer this [smaller] size.”

Uh, sure, said Segal, but what about that slippery price? She was as slippery as the price, declaring that the product “is competitively priced.” That wasn’t the question, but her whole game is to avoid giving the honest answer: “We’re gouging our customers.”

Conglomerate food packagers not only feel free to dupe us consumers, but also consider such corporate chicanery to be a legitimate business practice.

“Halving the Portion, But Not the Price,” The New York Times, June 23, 2013.

“Sneaky packages,” Consumer Reports, June 2013.

I’m making moves!

We’re pleased to announce that we’ve started a Substack newsletter for all of our content. You’ll still find our older, archived materials here at hightowerlowdown.org, but the latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our new Substack website.

Check out jimhightower.substack.com »

Send this to a friend