We're working on migrating all of our archives to the new website, but in the meantime, you can read this older version. Just note that some links may not work -- if you experience a serious problem or otherwise need help, just email

Scholastic propaganda

Cowboy hat By Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer - Mon., 9/12/11
Bookmark and Share

"The vast majority of our programs are not controversial," says the CEO of the world's largest publisher of children's educational material, "but once in a while there is a slip-up in editorial judgment." I'll say! Like taking big bucks from Big Coal to produce a curriculum packet for fourth-grade teachers that was a shameless propaganda piece for--guess who --Big Coal. That "slip-up" by Scholastic Inc. precipitated an avalanche of anger from parents, children's advocacy groups, and environmentalists. The $2 billion-a-year corporation was buried in bad publicity raising questions about the integrity of its classroom materials.

This was not Scholastic's first trip down the slippery slope of corporate-financed "education." It has also taken cash to produce books and lesson plans that served the interests of Brita, Disney, Microsoft, Nestle, and Shell. Publishing the biased content of these funders matters, for Scholastic is able to get its materials into 90 percent of US classrooms --which, of course, is why corporate giants want to buy-in. Indeed, Scholastic brags that it reaches young minds with curriculum-connected programs that can influence behavior and affect "brand awareness and consumer loyalty."

Now, however, the outcry has forced Scholastic to terminate some of its industry puff pieces and announce a partial retreat on accepting corporate funds, while also setting up a quasi-independent review board to vet all materials produced in "partnerships" with industry.

To be worthy of its name, Scholastic needs to sever all corporate connections, which is why We the People must stay on their case. To keep up and speak up, go to

Bookmark and Share