BUSH’S FAREWELL GIFT TO CHEMICAL BOSSES

For nearly eight years, George W’s labor department has been a do-nothing agency, viewing the safety needs of America’s workers with benign neglect. Thank goodness for small favors.

For nearly eight years, George W’s labor department has been a do-nothing agency, viewing the safety needs of America’s workers with benign neglect. Thank goodness for small favors.

Counter conformity.

Stand out with Lowdown gear.

Enjoying Hightower? How about a weekly email that gives you the full scoop?

In the 11th hour of the Bushites’ reign, this comatose agency has suddenly jumped from benign neglect to malevolent aggressiveness. At issue is the protection of laborers from exposure to deadly workplace poisons. With no public warning, no consultation with labor groups, no discussion with key lawmakers, and no compliance with the normal rule-making procedure, the political office of the labor department is engaged in a regulatory sneak attack, quietly issuing a proposal that drastically weakens protections for America’s workforce. In response to industry lobbyists, the new rule undermines the cautious assumption that a worker’s risk of harm must be based on very long, accumulated exposure to the toxins. Corporations complained to the White House that this precautionary principle overstates the workplace dangers posed by asbestos, lead, and other lethal chemicals.

The department’s risk assessment experts were not even shown the proposed change until April. They opposed it—and assumed that it was dead. On July 7th, however, a cryptic, nine-word item on a White House website revealed that the politicos had gone around them and were determined to sneak it through. Exposed, Bush appointees asserted that administration policy prevented them from revealing the details of the proposal, much less explaining who wrote it and why it was being pushed in a rush of secrecy.

This is Jim Hightower saying… Actually, I would let the industry have its weakened exposure limits—as long as the corporate CEOs agreed to have the same dosages of the same toxins placed in all of their executive suites. I’ll bet personal danger would enhance their zeal for safety protections.

“Last Minute Mischief for Labor,” New York Times, August 8, 2008.

“U.S. Rushes to Change Workplace Toxin Rules,” Washington Post, July 23, 2008 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/22/AR2008072202838_pf.html

“Lawmaker press Labor Dept on worker exposure rule,” Washington Post, July 23, 2008, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/23/AR2008072302959_pf.html

"Two wrongs don't make a right, but three left turns do." --Jim Hightower


“Documents Reveals labor Effort to Add More Hoops to Regulating Workplace Toxins,” Washington Post, July 24, 2008, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/24/AR2008072403021_pf.html

“Democrats Ask Labor to Forgo ‘Secret Rule'” Washington Post, July 23, 2008, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/23/AR2008072303694_pf.html

“Democrat Vows Bill to Block ‘Secret Rule’ on Workplace Toxins,” Washington Post, July 25, 2008. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/25/AR2008072500595_pf.html

“No Role in This Labor Rule,” Washington Post, July 29, 2008. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902117_pf.html

“Bill would block last-minute Labor Dept rule,” Washington Post, July 31, 2008. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/31/AR2008073701591_pf.html

“Battling the bastards is about as much fun as you can have with your clothes on.”

Never miss a word from Hightower– sign up today:

Send this to a friend