BUSH’S OILY LIES

When it comes to energy policy, George W has oil for brains. If he could, he’d lease out the Rose Garden so Exxon Mobil could sink a well there.

You're currently reading an archived version of Jim Hightower's work.

The latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our Substack website. Join us there!

Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
BUSH’S OILY LIES
/

When it comes to energy policy, George W has oil for brains. If he could, he’d lease out the Rose Garden so Exxon Mobil could sink a well there.

Remember the lies the Bushites told while rushing congress and the public into their Iraq war? Now they’re using the same tactics to stampede us into an awfully oily energy future. Open up our coastal waters to more floating oil derricks, cries Bush, unleash Big Oil on Alaska’s wildlife refuge, and turn our national parks into drilling opportunities! More domestic production is the solution to $4 gasoline, he hollers, blaming those meanies in Congress for standing in the way of beneficent oil companies that want nothing more than to lower our prices. “The need for congressional action is urgent,” he wailed.

Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:

Big fat fib. First, opening up those public lands and waters would have no effect on gasoline prices. It’d take years to develop any potential that is there, and even then the areas hold only a couple of year’s worth of America’s oil consumption.

Second, any oil produced is as likely to go to China or India as to us. These are global corporations with no loyalty to American consumers, and they’ll sell anything they can extract from our public resources to the highest bidder. Indeed, there’s nothing to stop China’s oil company from winning these drilling rights and shipping the oil anywhere it wants.

Third, Big Oil doesn’t really want more crude. They’re reaping huge profits by keeping world supply short and are not even drilling on 68 million acres of public leases they already hold. Make them drill there before we expose even more of our natural resources to their contamination.

Fourth – and most important – we should be investing in a massive conservation push to consume less oil, not trying to squeeze a few drops more out of our already oil-soaked earth.

“Bush keep up pressure to allow offshore drilling,” Austin American Statesman, July 20, 2008.

“Lawmakers R-energized on Energy,” The New York Times, July 9, 2008.

“Offshore Drilling – The Full Story,” www.my.barackobama.com, July 10, 2008.

“Schwarzenegger says drilling ban not to blame for high gas prices,” www.latimes.com, June 19, 2008.

“Wash. Post headline–‘Offshore drilling backed as remedy for oil prices’–undermined by article itself,” www.mediamatters.org, July 14, 2008.

“CBS Evening News Airs Brief Against Offshore Drilling,” www.newsbusters.org, June 18, 2008.

“Calls for offshore drilling win some, but debate rages,” www.usatoday.com, July 11, 2008.

“Lifting the ban on offshore drilling?” www.caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com, July 15, 2008.

“Dear 44: Drilling only benefits Big Oil,” www.politico.com , June 30, 2008.

I’m making moves!

We’re pleased to announce that we’ve started a Substack newsletter for all of our content. You’ll still find our older, archived materials here at hightowerlowdown.org, but the latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our new Substack website.

Check out jimhightower.substack.com »

Send this to a friend