CLEAN-MONEY CANDIDATES ARE WINNING

Cynics say that we'll never get the controlling, corrupt corporate money out of politics. But those who say it can't be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

You're currently reading an archived version of Jim Hightower's work.

The latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our Substack website. Join us there!

Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
CLEAN-MONEY CANDIDATES ARE WINNING
Loading
/

Cynics say that we’ll never get the controlling, corrupt corporate money out of politics. But those who say it can’t be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

For money reform that works – look not to Washington, but to states and cities, which are passing laws that provide public financing of their elections. This gives candidates an option that frees them from always going around rattling a tin cup for donations. The “Clean Elections” option is changing politics.

Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:

Maine, for example, has had four election cycles under its public financing system, and the astonishing result is that Mainers now have a state legislature in which 83 percent of its members have been elected with clean money. Nancy Smith, a small dairy farmer, is one of those house members, as is Deborah Simpson, a single mom who was a waitress. Neither could have run without the possibility of public funding. As Nancy says, “Clean campaigns allow those who work to run for office, and they create ‘citizen legislatures’ that bring very different perspectives and a different energy to government.”

Likewise, 59 percent of Arizona’s legislators have risen to office without taking special-interest money. In addition, nine of Arizona’s eleven statewide elected offices are held by clean-money candidates, including Governor Janet Napolitano, who says she could not have beaten her corporate funded opponents without the pubic system.

North Carolina offers the clean-money funding option for its two top courts. In 2004, clean candidates won four of the five seats that were up for grabs on these courts, and last year, the publicly funded contenders took five of the six seats that were up. A reform leader says: “This change simply would not have happened without clean elections.”

This is Jim Hightower saying… To bring real reform to elections in your area, visit Public Campaign’s website: www.publiccampaign.org.

Sources:
“2002-2006 General Election Comparison,” Maine Clean Elections, 2006.
Smith, Nancy. Phone Interview. January 2007.
“Profile: Maine Rep. Deborah Simpson,” Public Campaign, August 14, 2006.
“2006 Election statistics,” Arizona Clean Elections, December 6, 2006.
Ehst, Eric. Phone Interview. January 2007.
“Clean Election Candidates in Three States Win More Than 200 State Office Seats,” Public Campaign, November 10, 2006.
“Now on PBS,” www.pbs.org, October 20, 2006.

I’m making moves!

We’re pleased to announce that we’ve started a Substack newsletter for all of our content. You’ll still find our older, archived materials here at hightowerlowdown.org, but the latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our new Substack website.

Check out jimhightower.substack.com »

Send this to a friend