Congress chooses to keep poisoning children

Yes, we certainly need to cut unnecessary and even frivolous federal spending, because… well, because it's unnecessary and frivolous.
Archive You're reading an older Hightower Lowdown article. Jim's still writing — twice a week on Substack.
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Congress chooses to keep poisoning children
Loading
/

Yes, we certainly need to cut unnecessary and even frivolous federal spending, because… well, because it’s unnecessary and frivolous.

So, Congress has targeted unnecessary oil subsidies and frivolous tax giveaways to billionaires, right? Uh… no. Instead, our learned solons have chosen to whack the Lead Poisoning Prevention Program. This tiny, $30 million fund (not even a decimal point in the national budget) was slashed by 94 percent to only $2 million. Gutting this program will not save you and me a penny on our tax bills.

Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:

Well, retort the whackers, who needs this program, anyway? Some of the poorest families in America, that’s who. Lead poisoning from contaminated paint and soil is a silent epidemic in our country, afflicting some half-a-million low-income children a year with permanent brain damage and loss of IQ. The only safe level of lead in a child’s blood is zero, which is why this program to monitor blood levels of lead and help state health departments inspect homes and contain the poison was initiated.

Lead poisoning is entirely preventable. America has the science and programs to stop this insidious destruction of babies’ brains. Yet, even the miniscule $30-million budget the program previously had couldn’t touch the crisis of lead contamination in the four million homes in which vulnerable children live – and now Congress has refused this dollop of funding, responding instead to the wails of Wall Street billionaires that federal spending be cut to preserve their minuscule tax rates.

Imagine the national emergency declaration from Congress if 4 million homes of the superrich posed a danger to their children. But, then, we’re told that such thoughts amount to class war – and we can’t have that, can we? To fight this outrage, go to www.LeadSafe.org.

“Cuts to Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs Put Kids at Risk,” www.leadsafe.org, 2012.

“One of Congress’s Most Damaging (and Racist) Budget Cuts That Flew Under the Radar,” www.alternet.org, February 7, 2012.

“Advocates Object To Devastating Cut To Lead Poisoning Prevention Program,” www.nchh.org, January 2012.

“Federal cuts to lead poisoning prevention programs concern city, state officials,” www.cleveland.com, January 22, 2012.

Keep reading Jim
Get the free Lowdown
Jim's twice-weekly commentaries delivered free to your inbox. No credit card, no catch.
No credit card. Unsubscribe anytime.
Go deeper
Get everything Jim's got
Live Q&As, the Chat & Chew series, radio archives, and more. Less than a cup of coffee a month.
Subscribe for $40/year
Special rate for original Lowdown readers
Regular price: $50/year
Jim Hightower's Lowdown
The Lowdown moved —
Jim didn't stop writing.

Get Jim's commentaries delivered every Tuesday and Thursday — free, to your inbox. Join 50,000+ readers.

Get the free Lowdown →
or go paid
Subscribe for $40/year
Special rate for original Lowdown readers — regular price $50/yr