When corporate executives needed a political favor, they always went running to Congress. But now they can also run to the courthouse.
Over the years, corporate chieftains and their political henchmen have steadily ensconced reliable laissez-faire idologues in hundreds of federal judgeships, quietly creating a corporate-friendly path for moving their litigation all the way from the district level through the supremes. For example, in its effort to scuttle Obama’s healthcare reform, the right-wing has gone court shopping. They’ve filed their cases in the courts of judges who are known to be ideologically hostile to government regulation of health care corporations.
Take U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson in Virginia. On December 13, he ruled that a key provision of the new law is unconstitutional, a ruling at odds with 14 other federal judges who’d dismissed similar challenges. He had to resort to twisted reasoning to reach his decision and keep the right-wing’s flawed case moving. But, hey – you can’t let legal niceties get in the way of ideology.
Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:
Peek under Hudson’s judicial robe, and you’ll find a naked partisan with a long career in hard-right Republican politics. A protégé of Ronald Regan and his detestable attorney general, Ed Meese, Hudson ran unsuccessfully for a Virginia congressional seat in 1991, then was given two GOP political appointments in the state before George W lifted him onto the federal bench in 2002.
Even today, as he sits in judgment of politically-motivated cases, Hudson continues to draw annual income as an owner of a Republican political consulting firm. One of the firm’s successful clients in 2009 was Ken Cuccinelli, who was elected to be Virginia’s attorney general. Ken just happens to be the official who filed the right-wing’s case against Obama’s health care reform in Judge Hudson’s court.
Special rate for original Lowdown readers