Making Scholastic Inc. shape up

"The vast majority of our programs are not controversial," says the CEO of the world's largest publisher of children's educational material, "but once in a while there is a slip up in editorial judgment."
Archive You're reading an older Hightower Lowdown article. Jim's still writing — twice a week on Substack.
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Making Scholastic Inc. shape up
Loading
/

“The vast majority of our programs are not controversial,” says the CEO of the world’s largest publisher of children’s educational material, “but once in a while there is a slip up in editorial judgment.”

I’ll say! Like taking big bucks from Big Coal to produce a curriculum packet for fourth-grade teachers that was a shameless propaganda piece for – guess who – Big Coal. That “slip up” by Scholastic Inc. precipitated an avalanche of anger from parents, children’s advocacy groups, and environmentalists. The $2-billion-a-year corporation was buried in bad publicity and stung with fundamental questions about the integrity of its classroom materials.

Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:

It turns out that this was not Scholastic’s first trip down the slippery slope of corporate-financed “education.” It has also taken cash to produce books and lesson plans that served the self-interests of such brand-name outfits as Brita, Disney, Microsoft, Nestlé, and Shell. Publishing the biased content of these funders matters, for Scholastic is able to get its materials into 90 percent of U.S. classrooms – which, of course, is why corporate giants want to buy-in. Indeed, Scholastic brags that it reaches young minds with curriculum-connected programs that can influence behavior and affect “brand awareness and consumer loyalty.”

Now, however, Scholastic’s behavior is being influenced. The publics outcry forced it to terminate some of its industry puff pieces and announce a partial retreat on accepting corporate funds, while also setting up a quasi-independent review board to vet all materials produced in “partnerships” with industry.

To be worthy of its name, Scholastic needs to sever all corporate connections, which is why We the People must stay on their case. To keep up and speak up, go to www.commercialfreechildhood.org.

“Children’s Publisher Backing Off Its Corporate Ties,” The New York Times, August 1, 2011

“Big Coal Buys Access to 4th Graders,” http://www.jimhightower.com/node/7477, June 26, 2011.

Keep reading Jim
Get the free Lowdown
Jim's twice-weekly commentaries delivered free to your inbox. No credit card, no catch.
No credit card. Unsubscribe anytime.
Go deeper
Get everything Jim's got
Live Q&As, the Chat & Chew series, radio archives, and more. Less than a cup of coffee a month.
Subscribe for $40/year
Special rate for original Lowdown readers
Regular price: $50/year
Jim Hightower's Lowdown
The Lowdown moved —
Jim didn't stop writing.

Get Jim's commentaries delivered every Tuesday and Thursday — free, to your inbox. Join 50,000+ readers.

Get the free Lowdown →
or go paid
Subscribe for $40/year
Special rate for original Lowdown readers — regular price $50/yr