NO PUNISHMENT FOR EXXON MALFEASANCE?

How time flies. For example, think back to 1989. Hillary Clinton was the obscure first lady of Arkansas, back then. Roger Clemens was pitching for the Boston Red Socks and had never even heard of steroids. And The Exxon Valdez ran aground in Alaska’s Prince William Sound, causing the worst oil spill in U.S. history.

You're currently reading an archived version of Jim Hightower's work.

The latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our Substack website. Join us there!

Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
NO PUNISHMENT FOR EXXON MALFEASANCE?
Loading
/

How time flies. For example, think back to 1989. Hillary Clinton was the obscure first lady of Arkansas, back then. Roger Clemens was pitching for the Boston Red Socks and had never even heard of steroids. And The Exxon Valdez ran aground in Alaska’s Prince William Sound, causing the worst oil spill in U.S. history.

Nineteen years later, Exxon has merged into Exxon Mobil, and it has prospered enormously, banking $40 billion in profits last year alone – the richest year for any corporation in history. Back at Prince William Sound, however, the picture is not so rosy, for Exxon’s malfeasance devastated the ecology, the economy, and thousands of lives there.

Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:

In an area that’s dependent on fishing, the waters are still polluted with some 85 tons of Exxon’s crude. Herring – which was the main catch for local fishing families, accounting for half of the yearly income for many of them – has essentially been wiped out by the spill. The economic stress has led to bankruptcies, divorces, and suicides.

Meanwhile, Exxon Mobil has deployed a battalion of $600-an-hour lawyers to stiff the locals, keeping the people’s lawsuit stalled in America’s corporate-biased court system. Nearly two decades ago, a jury awarded $5 billion in punitive damages to some 33,000 victims of Exxon’s spill, yet the oil giant has not paid a penny of it. In various appeals courts the corporation got the sum cut in half – and its lawyers are now asking the Supreme Court to reduce the penalty to absolute zero.

So, 19 years after it’s tanker dumped 11 million gallons of crude into the lives of thousands of people, Exxon Mobil is pulling every legal trick to avoid a punishment that would amount to only three week’s worth of its 2007 profits. And Exxon’s top executives, living in luxury 3,000 miles away, wonder why people despise Big Oil.

“High court may lower Exxon’s $2.5 billion fine for Valdez spill,” Austin American Statesman, February 28, 2008

“As Exxon oil spill case goes before high court, Alaska town awaits end,” Austin American Statesman, February 27, 2008

The Lowdown has moved!

We’ve started a Substack newsletter for all of our content. You’ll still find our older, archived materials here at hightowerlowdown.org, but the latest (and greatest?) observations from Jim Hightower are only now available at our new Substack website: jimhightower.substack.com.

Check out jimhightower.substack.com »

Send this to a friend