THE PRICE OF CONGLOMERATE JOURNALISM

The new managing editor of Time magazine has a rather grandiose sense of his publication's place in the scheme of things. He declared that Time is for people "looking for one source to speak with authority and explain the world." Great – maybe he could start by explaining (authoritatively, of course) why Time Inc. dumped Barlett and Steele.
Archive You're reading an older Hightower Lowdown article. Jim's still writing — twice a week on Substack.
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
Jim Hightower's Radio Lowdown
THE PRICE OF CONGLOMERATE JOURNALISM
Loading
/

The new managing editor of Time magazine has a rather grandiose sense of his publication’s place in the scheme of things. He declared that Time is for people “looking for one source to speak with authority and explain the world.” Great – maybe he could start by explaining (authoritatively, of course) why Time Inc. dumped Barlett and Steele.

Don Barlett and Jim Steel are the premier investigative team in journalism today. Their in-depth work on everything from corporate welfare to our jerryrigged tax system has earned two Pulitzer Prizes and given mass-market media some respect at a time that “journalism” has been degraded to sensationalism.

Enjoying Hightower's work? Join us over at our new home on Substack:

In May, however, after nine years at Time, these two suddenly found themselves on the street, unceremoniously sacked in a round of corporate cost-cutting. A company honcho, said of Barlett and Steel: “They’re very good, but very expensive,” adding that there just wasn’t room in the budget for the duo.

Well, yes, real dig-it-out journalism certainly is more expensive than yet another Britney Spears profile, but investigative work is supposed to be a journalistic responsibility. As for tight budgets, I recall that Time splurged about $4 million this year for the right to run photos of Angelina Jolie’s new baby! Come on – this is Time Warner we’re talking about, a $140 billion multi-media giant.

The problem with conglomerate-owned media is that its primary focus is not on producing good journalism, but on producing fatter profits. At the time of the firing, Steele said simply, but pointedly: “The decision was made at the corporate level not to fund this type of work.”

This is Jim Hightower saying… Barlett and Steele have now landed happily at Vanity Fair and will continue their great work. Supposedly, Time Inc. is now making more money… but it’s doing far less with it, and it’s paying with its own reputation.

Sources:
“An Established Reporting Team Moves to Vanity Fair,” The New York Times, August 7, 2006.
“Steve Lovelady,” CJR Daily, May 18, 2006.
“Richard Stengel is chosen to be top editor at Time,” The New York Times, May 18, 2006.
“A Thirst for Black Ink From Good Newspapers,” The Washington Post, June 13, 2006.

Keep reading Jim
Get the free Lowdown
Jim's twice-weekly commentaries delivered free to your inbox. No credit card, no catch.
No credit card. Unsubscribe anytime.
Go deeper
Get everything Jim's got
Live Q&As, the Chat & Chew series, radio archives, and more. Less than a cup of coffee a month.
Subscribe for $40/year
Special rate for original Lowdown readers
Regular price: $50/year
Jim Hightower's Lowdown
The Lowdown moved —
Jim didn't stop writing.

Get Jim's commentaries delivered every Tuesday and Thursday — free, to your inbox. Join 50,000+ readers.

Get the free Lowdown →
or go paid
Subscribe for $40/year
Special rate for original Lowdown readers — regular price $50/yr